# Experimental Results

## WHERE DATE

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 237. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 29.5/10,000.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 237. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 42/10,000.

A similar table to that shown above arises with the omission of the key word *447*. Although
this table has fewer columns on the left, the associated probability is less: 60.5/10,000.

## WHERE YEAR

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 262. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 2.5/10,000.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 263. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 4.5/10,000.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 262. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 8.5/10,000.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 262. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 9.5/10,000.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 262. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 12.5/10,000.

A similar table to that above arises with the key word *447* omitted. The probability
associated with the table is 58.5/10,000.

## DATE YEAR

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 236. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 30/10,000.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 119. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 31/10,000.

A similar table to that above with the additional key word *447* arises with associated
probability 59/10,000. The probability is higher because the table needs additional columns on the
right side.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 236. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 69.5/10,000.

## WHERE HOW

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 108. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 126/10,000.

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 717. With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 36.5/10,000.

## YEAR HOW

The automatic search produced a cylinder size of 2302. The table is 53 rows by 268 columns and too big to show.
With expected number of ELSs set to
50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce
a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 140.5/10,000.