Barack Obama
The Democratic Candidate for the President of the United States in 2008 is Barack Hussein Obama. He is currently serving as one of the Senators from the State of Illinois. He has established for himself one of the most liberal voting records in the Senate. He has had close associations with people from the Black religious community, such as Pastor Jeremiah Wright, who has said in one of his speeches: "God damn America, the U.S. is to blame for 9/11". He has had close associations with people from the Chicago political community who are regarded as part of the corrupt Cook County political mafia. When he had, as an Illinois Senator the possibility of facilitating change in the corrupt Cook County machine, instead of reform, he backed the establishment politician Tom Stroger. This is easy to understand as Obama is a political opportunist.
Obama is for change. Being for change, he will say whatever he thinks he has to say to get elected. So regardless of what he has said or has changed what he has said, once in office he will act in accordance with his liberal values. He will drastically reduce the defense budget, effectively disarming the US. He will precipitately withdraw US forces from Iraq. He will appease Ahmadinejad and Hamas and he will abandon Israel. The end result of all of this is a war that will be started by those countries who think that because Obama's policies are weak, that the US will no longer defend our mideast allies.
1. Where
For the Who key word, we try the following possibilities: Barack Obama, BarackObama, B. Obama, and Obama. For the What key word we use President. The Who and the What constitute the topic. The Where component is the U.S.. This makes a total of 4 key word combination sets. With expected number of ElSs set to 100, the best table uses the name key word Obama. The probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table with the key word Obama as compact as that observed from the Torah text is 14.5/1,000.
It is interesting that this table has in it an ELS of the key word Barack. The skip of the Barack ELS is 33 which is larger than the maximum skip of 5 for the key word Barack when the expected number of ELSs is set to 100. Hence, this table having the skip 33 ELS of Barack could not have been found with the protocol we used. We only noticed it after seeing the table above.
Further supporting the results of the above experiments, there is the following table in which appears an ELS of the key word BarackObama, along with the key words President and Of the US. The probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 3.5/1,000.
2. When Date
This category of experiment had four forms for Obama and three forms for the date Cheshvon 6, making a total of 12 key word combination sets. The When date experiment did not yield any interesting table.3. When Year
The next group of experiments links the topic Obama and president with the where year component which is 5769. For the Who component, Obama, we have four possible key words Obama, B. Obama, Barack Obama, and BarackObama. For the What component, we have the one key word for President. For the Where Year component, we have four key words 5769, in 5769, (5)769, and in (5)769. This makes a total of 16 key word combination sets. One of these key word sets produced an interesting table. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 39/1,000.
4. How
This category of experiments had four forms for Obama and 2 forms for being elected, making a total of 8 key word combination sets. The How experiment did not yield any interesting table.5. Where When Date
This category of experiment had four forms for Obama and three forms for the date Cheshvon 6, making a total of 12 key word combination sets. The Where When Date experiment did not yield any interesting table.6. Where When Year
The next group of experiments links Obama with the year which is 5769 and the location, the US. For the name Obama, we have four possible key words Obama, B. Obama, Barack Obama, and BarackObama. We have one the key word for President. We have four key words for the year 5769, in 5769, (5)769, and in (5)769. And we have one key word for the U.S.. This makes a total of 16 key word combination sets. One of these key word sets produced an interesting table. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 8.5/1,000.
7. Where How
For the Who key word, we try the following possibilities: Barack Obama, BarackObama, B. Obama, and Obama. For the What key word we use President. The Who and the What constitute the topic. The Where component is the U.S.. The how component is is/was elected and will be elected . This makes a total of 8 key word combination sets. With expected number of ElSs set to 100, the best table uses the name key word Obama. The probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table with the key word Obama as compact as that observed from the Torah text is 11/1,000.
8. When Date Year
This category of experiments had four forms for Obama, three forms for the date Cheshvon 6, four forms for the year 5769, making a total of 48 key word combination sets. The best result used the key word Barack Obama, On Cheshvon 6, and In (5)769. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 65/1,000.
9. When Date How
The next group of experiments links the election of Obama with the date November 4. So to the topic key words Obama, President, of which there are four combinations, we add key words for either is/was elected or will be elected. And we add key words for the date Cheshvon 6, on Cheshvon 6 and 6th of Cheshvon. This makes a total of 24 key word combination sets. One of these key word sets produced an interesting table. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 52.5/1,000.
10. When Year How
The next group of experiments links the election of Obama with the year which is 5769. So to the topic key words Obama, President we add key words for either is/was elected or will be elected. And we add key words for the year 5769, in 5769, (5)769, and in (5)769. This makes a total of 8 key word combination sets. One of these key word sets produced an interesting table. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a table as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 4.5/10,000.
11. Where When Date Year
This category of experiments has four forms for Obama, three forms for the date Cheshvon 6, and four forms for the year 5760, making a total of 48 key word combination sets. The best table used the key word Barack Obama, On Cheshvon 6, and In (5)769. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce a result as compact as that produced by the Torah text is 60.5/1,000.
12. Where When Date How
This category of experiment used four forms for Obama, three forms for the date Cheshvon 6 and 2 forms for being elected, making a total of 24 key word combination sets. The Where When Date How experiments produced not statistically significant results.
13. Where When Year How
Next we try experiments to link the election of Obama with the year which is 5769 and the place, the US. So to the key words Obama, President we add key words for either is/was elected or will be elected. And we add key words for the year 5769, in 5769, (5)769, and in (5)769. And we add the key word for US. This makes a total of 8 key word combination sets. Two of these key word sets produce interesting tables.
With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the best table used the key words is/was elected and in (5)769. The probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 1.5/20,000.
The next best table used the key words will be elected and in (5)769. The probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 50.5/20,000. It is interesting that both of these tables occur on the same cylinder size in the same place and share some common ELSs.
14. When Date Year How
This category of experiment used four forms for Obama, three forms for the date Cheshvon 6, four forms for the year 5769, and 2 forms for being elected, making a total of 96 key word combination sets. The best of the 96 tables was the one having the key words On Cheshvon 6, 5769, and is/was elected. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah tex is 10.5/1,000.
15. Where When Date Year How
This category of experiments used four forms for Obama, three forms for the date Cheshvon 6, four forms for the year 5769, and two forms for being elected, making a total of 96 key word combination sets. The best table used the key words Barack Obama, is/was elected, On Cheshvon 6 and (5)769. With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would produce as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 36.5/1,000.
Finally, we did some experiments using the date of inauguration, which is January 20, 2009. This corresponds to the 24th of Tevet. However, none of the tables was interesting.